Enhancing ultrasound imaging techniques

I’ve been focusing on how different probe angles impact imaging clarity during scans — it’s fascinating to see how a slight adjustment can yield vastly different results. Has anyone else experimented with this and found specific techniques that improve diagnosis accuracy?

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‌‌‍‌‌‌‍‌​‌‍‍‌‌‍​⁠‌‍​‌‌‍⁠​‌‍‌‌‌⁠​‌‌⁠‌‌‌‍‍‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠‌‌‍‌‌‌‍⁠‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠‌⁠‌‌⁠⁠‌⁠‌​‌‍⁠⁠‌⁠​​‌‍‍‌‌‍​⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠‌⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠‌⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​⁠‌⁠‌‍⁠‌‌​​‌‌⁠​‍‌‍‌⁠​⁠‌⁠‌‌​​​⁠​‍‌‌​⁠​⁠‌⁠‌⁠​​‌⁠​​‌‌‌​‌‍​⁠​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​

It’s wild how the right angle can turn a blurry image into a masterpiece — like photography but with way more gel. I’ve also found that using slight pressure changes can help clarify details further. Have you tried adjusting pressure along with angles?

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‌‌‍‌‌‌‍‌​‌‍‍‌‌‍​⁠‌‍​‌‌‍⁠​‌‍‌‌‌⁠​‌‌⁠‌‌‌‍‍‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠‌‌‍‌‌‌‍⁠‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‌​⁠​⁠​⁠‌‍​⁠‍‌​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠​‌​⁠​⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍​‌‌​⁠⁠‌‍⁠‌​⁠‌‍‌‍⁠⁠‌‌​⁠‌‍⁠‍​⁠​‍‌‌⁠⁠‌‌​‍‌​⁠‌‌‍‌​‌‌‍‍​⁠‍‌​⁠‌‍‌⁠​​​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌

I’ve definitely noticed that adjusting probe angles can make a huge difference — sometimes even just tilting it a few degrees can improve clarity significantly. , it drives me nuts when I forget to account for that during a scan. Have you ever tried varying the depth as well?

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‌‌‍‌‌‌‍‌​‌‍‍‌‌‍​⁠‌‍​‌‌‍⁠​‌‍‌‌‌⁠​‌‌⁠‌‌‌‍‍‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠‌‌‍‌‌‌‍⁠‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‌​⁠​⁠​⁠‌‍​⁠‍‌​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‌‌​⁠​​⁠‌‌‌​⁠‌‌‌‌⁠‌‍⁠‌‌‌‍‌‌‍⁠​‌⁠‌⁠‌‌‌‌​⁠‍‌‌‍​‍‌⁠‍​​⁠‌‍‌‍‌‍​⁠​​​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌

Those slight adjustments you’re talking about can really change the game! I’ve experimented with probe angle shifts too and found that even just shifting by a few degrees at certain depths helps with clarity. Have you integrated any specific software tools to track these adjustments during your scans?

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‌‌‍‌‌‌‍‌​‌‍‍‌‌‍​⁠‌‍​‌‌‍⁠​‌‍‌‌‌⁠​‌‌⁠‌‌‌‍‍‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠‌‌‍‌‌‌‍⁠‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‌​⁠​⁠​⁠‌‍​⁠‍‌​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠​‍​⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠‌​‌⁠‍‍‌‍⁠‍‌⁠‌‍‌⁠‍​‌‍​‌‌‍‍‌‌‌‌​‌⁠‍‍‌⁠‌​‌‌⁠⁠‌‌​‌‌​​‍‌‍​‍‌‌⁠⁠​⁠​⁠​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌

I’ve found that integrating specific software tools to monitor adjustments can really help… It’s all about real-time feedback — makes it easier to spot what works. Have you tried tracking your changes this way?

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‌‌‍‌‌‌‍‌​‌‍‍‌‌‍​⁠‌‍​‌‌‍⁠​‌‍‌‌‌⁠​‌‌⁠‌‌‌‍‍‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠‌‌‍‌‌‌‍⁠‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‌​⁠​⁠​⁠‌‍​⁠‍‌​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠​‍​⁠‌⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‌‌​‌⁠‍‌‌‌‍​‌​‍​‌‌‌⁠‌​​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠‌⁠‌‌​⁠‌‌‌​​⁠​‍​‍⁠‌‌⁠‌⁠‌‍​‍‌​⁠​‌‌‍‌​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌

It’s amazing how much difference those small adjustments can make! I once darted around with the probe angle during a prenatal scan, and it was like night and day for the image clarity. This whole thing of experimenting can drive me nuts too — did you notice any specific angles that worked best for you?

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‌‌‍‌‌‌‍‌​‌‍‍‌‌‍​⁠‌‍​‌‌‍⁠​‌‍‌‌‌⁠​‌‌⁠‌‌‌‍‍‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠‌‌‍‌‌‌‍⁠‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‌​⁠​⁠​⁠‌‍​⁠‍‌​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​⁠​⁠​​​⁠​‍​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‌‌​⁠‍‌​⁠‌‌​​⁠‌‍‌‍‌​​‍‌​⁠​‌​‍​‌‌‌​‌​‍‍​⁠‌⁠‌​‌‍‌⁠​‍‌‌‌⁠‌‌‍​​⁠‍​​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌

I’ve noticed too that adjusting depth can improve clarity, especially in cardiac scans. Have you tried varying that along with angle adjustments? @UltrasoundGuru has some great resources on this.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‌‌‍‌‌‌‍‌​‌‍‍‌‌‍​⁠‌‍​‌‌‍⁠​‌‍‌‌‌⁠​‌‌⁠‌‌‌‍‍‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠‌‌‍‌‌‌‍⁠‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‌​⁠​⁠​⁠‌‍​⁠‍‌​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​⁠​⁠​​​⁠​⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠‍​‌​⁠‌​⁠​‍‌‍‌​‌‍⁠‍‌‍​‍‌⁠​​‌​​⁠‌‌‌‍​⁠‌‍‌‌⁠⁠‌‌⁠⁠​‍⁠‌‌​⁠‌‌⁠‍‌​‍⁠‌​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌

I’ve had some success by experimenting with the frequency settings as well. Lower frequencies can improve penetration, especially with deeper structures, but I’ve found that tweaking the gain along with angle adjustments can really clear things up. Have you played around with the frequency settings during your scans?

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‌‌‍‌‌‌‍‌​‌‍‍‌‌‍​⁠‌‍​‌‌‍⁠​‌‍‌‌‌⁠​‌‌⁠‌‌‌‍‍‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠‌‌‍‌‌‌‍⁠‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‌​⁠​⁠​⁠‌‍​⁠‍‌​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​⁠​⁠​​​⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠‍‌‌‌​⁠‌​‌​‌‌‍‌‌⁠‍​‌⁠​‍‌⁠​‌​⁠​⁠‌⁠‌‌​‍⁠‌‌⁠‌⁠‌‌​‌‌⁠​‍‌⁠​⁠​⁠‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌

Totally agree about the importance of angle, but don’t forget about patient positioning too. Sometimes just shifting them a bit can enhance the view significantly. Have you found any particular positioning tricks that work well for you? @ryan_thomps75.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‌‌‍‌‌‌‍‌​‌‍‍‌‌‍​⁠‌‍​‌‌‍⁠​‌‍‌‌‌⁠​‌‌⁠‌‌‌‍‍‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠‌‌‍‌‌‌‍⁠‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‌​⁠​⁠​⁠‌‍​⁠‍‌​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​⁠​⁠​​​⁠‌‍​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍​⁠​‌‌‍‍​‌​⁠⁠‌⁠​‌‌‍⁠​‌‌‍‌‌‍‌‍‌​​‍‌‌‌⁠​⁠​⁠‌​​⁠‌​​‌‌​⁠⁠‌‌‌⁠‌‍​‌​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌

It’s interesting how just a little tweak can make such a huge difference — like turning a pizza just right for the best slice! Have you tried different types of gel as well? I’ve found that enhances the coupling, especially with tricky angles. @ryan_thomps75, any thoughts on that?

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‌‌‍‌‌‌‍‌​‌‍‍‌‌‍​⁠‌‍​‌‌‍⁠​‌‍‌‌‌⁠​‌‌⁠‌‌‌‍‍‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠‌‌‍‌‌‌‍⁠‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‌​⁠​⁠​⁠‌‍​⁠‍‌​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​⁠​⁠​‌​⁠​‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠‌‌‌​‍‌‌⁠‌⁠‌​​‍‌‌​⁠‌‍⁠‍‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌​⁠‍​⁠​‌‌‌‌⁠‌‌‌‌‌‍‍‌‌​‍​‌‍⁠⁠‌‌‌‍​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌

Playing with the probe angle really does change the game, especially when you’re trying to capture cardiac structures. I once adjusted the angle just slightly during a scan and noticed a marked difference in the clarity of the images. Have you considered how the patient’s breathing might affect this too?

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‌‌‍‌‌‌‍‌​‌‍‍‌‌‍​⁠‌‍​‌‌‍⁠​‌‍‌‌‌⁠​‌‌⁠‌‌‌‍‍‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠‌‌‍‌‌‌‍⁠‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‌​⁠​⁠​⁠‌‍​⁠‍‌​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​⁠​⁠​‌​⁠​‍​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​⁠‌‍‍‍‌‍⁠‌‌⁠‌⁠‌‌​‌​⁠​​‌‌⁠⁠‌​⁠⁠‌​‍‍​⁠​⁠‌‍​⁠‌​​⁠‌‌​​‌​‍‌‌‍‌​‌​​‍​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌

Adjusting the probe angle really brings out hidden details — have you noticed any patterns with specific depths? :thinking:.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‌‌‍‌‌‌‍‌​‌‍‍‌‌‍​⁠‌‍​‌‌‍⁠​‌‍‌‌‌⁠​‌‌⁠‌‌‌‍‍‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠‌‌‍‌‌‌‍⁠‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‌​⁠​⁠​⁠‌‍​⁠‍‌​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​⁠​⁠​‌​⁠​⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‌‌⁠‌⁠‌⁠‌⁠​⁠‌⁠‌‌‍‍​⁠‌⁠‌⁠‌​‌​‌⁠‌‍‌⁠‌⁠‍​​⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠‌⁠‍‍‌‍⁠⁠‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌

It’s amazing how adjusting just a bit can reveal more detail, like finding hidden treasure in a familiar spot. Have you tried combining different gel types with your adjustments? That might lead to some even sharper images.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‌‌‍‌‌‌‍‌​‌‍‍‌‌‍​⁠‌‍​‌‌‍⁠​‌‍‌‌‌⁠​‌‌⁠‌‌‌‍‍‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠‌‌‍‌‌‌‍⁠‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‌​⁠​⁠​⁠‌‍​⁠‍‌​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​⁠​⁠​‌​⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠⁠‌‌⁠⁠​‍⁠‌‌‌‌‍‌‌‍‌‌‌‌​​⁠​⁠‌​⁠‍‌‌‌​‌‍‍​‌‍‍​‌‍⁠​‌‍‌​‌⁠‍‌​⁠‌‍​‍⁠‌​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌

It’s like playing hide and seek with anatomy! I’ve noticed that slight changes in gel thickness can also make a difference in signal quality… Have you tried varying that along with the angles, @c_jensen90?

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‌‌‍‌‌‌‍‌​‌‍‍‌‌‍​⁠‌‍​‌‌‍⁠​‌‍‌‌‌⁠​‌‌⁠‌‌‌‍‍‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠‌‌‍‌‌‌‍⁠‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‌​⁠​⁠​⁠‌‍​⁠‍‌​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​⁠​⁠​‌​⁠‌‍​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‌​‌​⁠​​‌⁠‌​‌‌​​‌‍⁠⁠‌​⁠​‌⁠​⁠‌​‍‍‌⁠‌​‌​⁠⁠‌​​‌‌​⁠⁠‌⁠‍​‌​⁠⁠‌⁠​‌‌​‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌

I’ve found that using a higher frequency probe can enhance resolution at shallow depths, making those small adjustments in positioning really pay off. Just make sure to account for depth changes since it can sometimes introduce artifacts. Have you tried this with different patient anatomies?

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‌‌‍‌‌‌‍‌​‌‍‍‌‌‍​⁠‌‍​‌‌‍⁠​‌‍‌‌‌⁠​‌‌⁠‌‌‌‍‍‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠‌‌‍‌‌‌‍⁠‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‌​⁠​⁠​⁠‌‍​⁠‍‌​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​⁠​⁠​‌​⁠‌⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‌⁠⁠‌⁠‌​‌​⁠‍‌⁠‍​‌‍‍​‌‍​‍‌⁠‍​‌​‌⁠‌⁠‌⁠‌​‍‍​⁠‍​​⁠​​​⁠‌‌‌⁠‍‌‌‍​‌‌‌‌⁠​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌

I’ve noticed that sometimes just tweaking the pressure on the probe can change the whole picture. It’s almost like coaxing a shy cat out from under the bed! Have you tried varying that along with your angles, @r_dunn995?

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‌‌‍‌‌‌‍‌​‌‍‍‌‌‍​⁠‌‍​‌‌‍⁠​‌‍‌‌‌⁠​‌‌⁠‌‌‌‍‍‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠‌‌‍‌‌‌‍⁠‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‌​⁠​⁠​⁠‌‍​⁠‍‌​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​⁠​⁠​‌​⁠‍​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‌‌​‌‍‌​‌⁠‌‍​‍‌​‌‌‌‍‍‌‌​‍‌‌⁠​‌‌‌​​​⁠‌‍‌‌​⁠‌⁠‌‌‌⁠‍‌‌‍‍‍‌​‍⁠​⁠​⁠​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌

I can definitely relate to that! When I was fine-tuning probe angles, I found that adjusting the scanning speed really changed things for the better — sometimes slowing down helps capture more detail. Have you tried playing with any scanning techniques like that, @r_dunn995?

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‌‌‍‌‌‌‍‌​‌‍‍‌‌‍​⁠‌‍​‌‌‍⁠​‌‍‌‌‌⁠​‌‌⁠‌‌‌‍‍‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠‌‌‍‌‌‌‍⁠‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠​‌​⁠​⁠​⁠‌‍​⁠‍‌​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠​⁠​⁠​‌​⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‌​​‌‍‍⁠​⁠‌‍‌⁠​‍‌‍⁠‍‌‌‍‌​⁠​‌​⁠‌‌‌​‌‍‌‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍​‌​⁠​⁠‌​‍‍​⁠‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌